Broken
Crosshairs on Vintage Scopes
The old
optical engineers knew a thing or two about lenses, glass, crosshairs and
making optics durable. Originally
crosshairs were constructed out of hair or spiderweb, these materials being
sufficiently thin and strong. Interestingly a spiderweb crosshair was
unaffected by recoil; being so light, thin and strong it was undamaged by acceleration
or deceleration while the scope that housed it was often stressed. Legend has it the old German optical
engineers kept specially bred spiders in jars in their workshops to provide
silk crosshairs for the instruments they built. Many years ago I experimented
with spider web for repairing damaged reticles but found the web of the common
spider to be too fine. I next tried fine
human hair but found it to be translucent as was fishing line. Many modern scopes use wire crosshairs, which
can be flattened to various degrees to change the width. These wires are
usually silver in colour, but appear black when backlit by the image passing
through the scope's optics. Wire
reticles are simple, as they require lines that pass all the way across the
reticle, and flattening the wire make duplex crosshairs possible. The advantage of wire crosshairs is that they
are fairly tough and durable, and provide no obstruction to light passing
through the scope. I experimented with
various types of fine electrical wire but found it was too thick for modern
high-magnification scopes and often had a “crinkly” appearance as it was
impossible to iron out the twists. Etched
reticles are more modern and the first suggestion for etched glass reticles was
made by Philippe de La Hire in 1700. His
method was based on engraving the lines on a glass plate with a diamond point. This technology proved to beyond the scope of
my home workshop. At this point I called
in my oldest friend who is a physicist-engineer and his researches revealed
that fibres of modern synthetic material such as found in Paracord and Cordura
are just right. They make simple uniform
crosshairs of correct thickness and are neither translucent nor distorted by
weaving.
The biggest problem was what we will call "Crinkly Crosshair" or "Crosshair Slump". The solution came with experimentation and perseverence until tautness was achieved. A fiddly business. |
The
occasion for all this experimentation was an incident of monumental clumsiness
on my part. While disassembling a Pecar
rifle scope in order to change the crosshair reticles, I broke the delicate
steel filaments thus rendering my favourite hunting scope useless. The fix became a fascinating project that has
continued on and off for twenty years.
The Pecar range of rifle scopes are now discontinued but there is still
a lively trade in used models and spare parts.
Unfortunately Pecars and other older European scopes now have a
collector value and they are gradually getting pushed beyond the reach of the
ordinary shooter. €600 can still buy a
fine example of the optical engineer’s art although most serious shooters
choose to spend much more on modern scopes with etched glass crosshairs which
must be returned to the manufacturer for maintenance and repairs. On a recent trip to visit al Conroy, an old
friend, now retired from the gun trade, I was given an original boxed Pecar
crosshair reticle of the German Post type.
It was two full years before I got around to examining it and when I did
so I found it too was damaged – probably in exactly similar circumstances as my
own. The post was partly detached but a
repair was possible. I shoot more
targets than game these days and I had an idea I wanted to try. Years ago, back in the sixties, Weaver
produced a double reticle which functioned as a rangefinder. By placing the double horizontal lines over a
target, its range could be reliably calculated.
Would the same idea work for the long range shooter? In situations where the target is beyond the
adjustment range of the scope would double crosshairs serve as long and short
range sights? The idea is not new – mil
dot reticles are common. The difference
here is that the range of adjustment of the scope is 24 moa and 60 moa is
needed at long range for cast bullets which necessarily travel at lower
velocity and drop more. I decided to
give it a try and reluctantly removed the damaged crosshairs with a pair of
pliers. The force required to extract
then was testimony to the skill of those old engineers. I would be working with synthetics.
The almost finished product. The lower crosshair slumped overnight and had to be re-done but the concept worked. A 50 and 350yard zero. |
Having
extracted a tangle of fibres from an old Cordura strap I isolated one filament
and anchored both ends with sticky paper.
I stretched it across the housing and glued it into place with my wife’s
nail varnish. This was a failure as the
relatively slow-drying varnish lacked the strength to tension the filament and
I ended up with saggy crosshairs. The
project stalled pending the arrival from Ebay of a little bottle of
fast-bonding glue used to attach false fingernails. Fashion has its uses. The second attempt was blessed with success
and all three crosshairs looked tight. I
still hadn’t the faintest clue what the interval between the two crosshairs
would be at 10x magnification so I set up the scope at 50 yards and used a
sheet of paper and ruler. The interval
was 22.5 inches exactly or 45 inches at 100 yards. A minute of angle is 1.047
inches at 100 yards so I had a 43 moa long range crosshair. I consulted my bullet drop table which showed
that for a 50 yard zero a 45 calibre bullet at 1300 feet per second dropped 43
moa or about 160 inches at 360 yards. I
was zeroed at 50 and 360 yards which is close to 300 meters – not bad for an
old codger doing a bit of inspired guesswork!
I went to bed delighted with my handiwork and when I went to admire my
new reticle the next morning, the 43 moa crosshair had sagged! Well, at least the idea worked in principle
and a half hour with the glue and the magnifying glass would finish the job.
The raw material. Polycarbonate fibres from webbing |
No comments:
Post a Comment